Skip to main content

Controversy helps promote crappy site

The "new" launched recently and was ill-received by Netscape users. Steve tried to unearth a controversy, saying that Netscape editors seeded the story on its homepage, to which Jason responded saying that users voted it to the top of the news on the homepage. Sounds like they're both missing the point.

What's more disappointing about the new homepage is that after hours and hours of usability, design and testing is that it sucks. That's the real news here, folks. The headline should read "Major Internet Player Launches Crappy Redesign". Care to differ? Just ask your users.

Let me beat the response to the punch -- I'm sure there were Beta people pissed when VHS came out. It happens. But turning on your base isn't exactly a wise business move. Unless, of course, you're going to fund a second-rate homepage to compete and possibly overtake Google. Good luck with that.

By the way, Yahoo, your new homepage blows too. The old one had more information, didn't have misfunctioning apps on its homepage (e.g. Yahoo Mail) and didn't force crappy celebrity/entertainment information like "The 9" in my face.

Tagged: , ,


Michael said…
Why are so many -- Netscape, the NYTimes, etc. -- rushing to make their sites look like a blog, or have a predominant look of a "social media" site??

It's a good idea, but too much -- like what Netscape has done -- to WAY too, too much. Very annoying. The viewers' choice is nice, but I'd also like some news judgment to play a role; not a popularity contest.

-- Mike
(Yes, I'm late with this comment, but was on vacation last week and used my free time to focus on living rather than blogging.)
David Binkowski said…
It's as if Jakob Neilsen's dream is coming true - design no longer matters when it comes to web sites. ;)

Hey Mike, I appreciate all comments. I just got back from vacation too, so sorry for the late approval!

Popular posts from this blog

How to Rick Roll Someone

I've noticed a lot of traffic to my blog from a post I did on Rick Roll. In particular, people are looking for how to do it. So, without further adieu, here's a quick 1, 2, 3 on "How to Rick Roll Someone."

Pick your target. This should be someone not suspecting a peculiar link, email or heads up. Works great if you're the guy/girl in the office known for sending YouTube links via IM
Grab the URL. The YouTube video is probably the easiest to snag, because the URL isn't a dead giveaway. Sites that truncate URLs like SnipURL and TinyURL are handy if you want to send folks to
Pick your delivery method and send! IM, email, blog (wink!), what-have-you.

Please, feel free to get creative. Our programmers used a "Can someone test this site?" email to the office to Rick Roll the entire staff. Or better yet - send the URL along to unsuspecting family members as "Our newest family pictures!".

Another fun way is via conference or phon…

My first Facebook spam!

Well, that didn't take long. I was spammed twice today via my Facebook profile by someone named Andrea Rowe, saying that she likes my profile picture (flattery is my weak spot) and wanted to chat. She's promoting a site through one of the TinyURL-esque sites and let me know that her username is "foxy_hotty". Here's her follow up message:

hi there David, how's it going? i wanted to chat with you, but they don't have that here, whatever. if you'd like to, you can check out my other profile at my username's foxy_hotty. we can chat there, just dont mind the bad pics, lol. soooo, ya, see you i hope.

Yes, I edited the SnipURL ending because I refuse to give spammers free promotion or even worse, the click through. For those unaware, sites like SnipURL and TinyURL allow you to send truncated versions of URLs, which is particularly handy when you're posting URLs to your blog (formatting) or SMS-based tools like Jaiku and Twitte…

Fake Facebook Likes and Twitter Followers -- And the Implications for Brands

This post originally appeared on the Large Media blog.

There's been a lot of talk about Twitter followers lately, including both presidential candidates, celebrities, musicians and the like utilizing services to game their numbers. Specifically, a lot of the "Top 10" have been found to have a substantial amount of fake followers, in some case to the point where 70% of their following is either bots or inactive profiles. Most articles and infographics on the subject are telling, however with a little digging you can find out that there are also social media "experts" utilizing the service to give the appearance of bloated numbers. Intrigued, and given our rare propensity to tweet as an agency, we wanted to see what the fuss was about.

So we gave it a try.


In August we saw some ads on a third party Twitter "profile checker" site  saying they can send a thousand followers your way for $9. The process is pretty simple: select how many followers yo…