Skip to main content

The Internet is inherently anti-corporate

I disagree with B.L.'s take on Chris's take that the internet is anti-corporate.

Paltry click-through rates, pop up and ad blockers, snarky comments and "no marketers/PR folks allowed" Second Life islands tell me otherwise.

Before I go on, I want to qualify what Chris was inferring -- most people don't want companies intruding in their personal space online, which is not the same as "not at all", and certainly differs when it's "done right".

Now -- do I think brands deserve representation online? Absolutely. If my clients are being misrepresented or their consumers want to engage then they should absolutely have that discussion.

However, it is important to remember why people are going online. Looking back, the internet wasn't created for marketers - it was created to share information. BBSing in the 80's and rudimentary 90's web sites weren't about being marketed to - they were about sharing information. Have web companies been able to sustain and become successful? Absolutely. And the chances are they're providing a service that makes life easier, like online banking or access to products not available where they live or social networking with friends.

Non-internet companies saw the opportunity to reach these audiences and potentially make money in this space, plain and simple. They're trying to figure out how to engage properly, which is where we come in.

People go online, do their business and leave. That explains why the majority of people (present company excluded) visit the same handful of sites and move on with their lives.

I think the brands B.L. mentioned have been able to connect online (you left out GM!) because they respect the rules of the venue and are not intruding in others personal space.


Chris Abraham said…
Wow! That is exactly right. You said it much better than I did. Cheers!
David Binkowski said…
Thanks for the comment, Chris. I think a lot of marketers have the attitude that they "belong" where they don't -- there are a lot of instances where the demographic data doesn't match up with reality, especially online.

Popular posts from this blog

How to Rick Roll Someone

I've noticed a lot of traffic to my blog from a post I did on Rick Roll. In particular, people are looking for how to do it. So, without further adieu, here's a quick 1, 2, 3 on "How to Rick Roll Someone."

Pick your target. This should be someone not suspecting a peculiar link, email or heads up. Works great if you're the guy/girl in the office known for sending YouTube links via IM
Grab the URL. The YouTube video is probably the easiest to snag, because the URL isn't a dead giveaway. Sites that truncate URLs like SnipURL and TinyURL are handy if you want to send folks to
Pick your delivery method and send! IM, email, blog (wink!), what-have-you.

Please, feel free to get creative. Our programmers used a "Can someone test this site?" email to the office to Rick Roll the entire staff. Or better yet - send the URL along to unsuspecting family members as "Our newest family pictures!".

Another fun way is via conference or phon…

My first Facebook spam!

Well, that didn't take long. I was spammed twice today via my Facebook profile by someone named Andrea Rowe, saying that she likes my profile picture (flattery is my weak spot) and wanted to chat. She's promoting a site through one of the TinyURL-esque sites and let me know that her username is "foxy_hotty". Here's her follow up message:

hi there David, how's it going? i wanted to chat with you, but they don't have that here, whatever. if you'd like to, you can check out my other profile at my username's foxy_hotty. we can chat there, just dont mind the bad pics, lol. soooo, ya, see you i hope.

Yes, I edited the SnipURL ending because I refuse to give spammers free promotion or even worse, the click through. For those unaware, sites like SnipURL and TinyURL allow you to send truncated versions of URLs, which is particularly handy when you're posting URLs to your blog (formatting) or SMS-based tools like Jaiku and Twitte…

Fake Facebook Likes and Twitter Followers -- And the Implications for Brands

This post originally appeared on the Large Media blog.

There's been a lot of talk about Twitter followers lately, including both presidential candidates, celebrities, musicians and the like utilizing services to game their numbers. Specifically, a lot of the "Top 10" have been found to have a substantial amount of fake followers, in some case to the point where 70% of their following is either bots or inactive profiles. Most articles and infographics on the subject are telling, however with a little digging you can find out that there are also social media "experts" utilizing the service to give the appearance of bloated numbers. Intrigued, and given our rare propensity to tweet as an agency, we wanted to see what the fuss was about.

So we gave it a try.


In August we saw some ads on a third party Twitter "profile checker" site  saying they can send a thousand followers your way for $9. The process is pretty simple: select how many followers yo…