Skip to main content

Tagging "ethics" and the effect of Google labels

Steve is making a call to bloggers to provide disclosure when they're getting paid to speak on behalf of a company. A commenter is questioning the motive of the post, which is coming on the heels of the Vista debacle disclosure debate.

But what is this, really? I'm going to call it for what it is - a hybrid SEO/PR campaign to try and own keywords like "Ethics" to cover up the mess. A top ranked blog + tagging specific keywords = "Let's leverage our current assets to hide any errors".

I've been discussing with a co-worker about the effect of Google's labeling function and how my search engine traffic has increased more than the 40% noted yesterday by John Battelle thanks to the separate label pages created by Blogger. Has the algorithm changed to help weight Blogger pages over other sites? I'd argue that yes, it did.

For example - based on my Sitemeter stats, the terms "true ads", "about.com sucks" and "BCS and Oklahoma" were driving traffic to my site long after the posts were created -- so much so that my page rank for each was in the top 4 results. Checking them today, I've been bumped down as many as ten places.

Comments

Jeremy said…
Who is Steve to talk? He rarely discloses, and I used to ping him on it all the time.

This is like having David Duke run a campaign for minority awareness.

Give me a break.
Steve Rubel said…
Sorry to disappoint, but you're flat out wrong here, David.
David Binkowski said…
You were much kinder to Canuck flack. Otherwise the practice should speak for itself without having to say "we're really taking this ethics thing seriously now" or by having a top PR blogger tell other bloggers how they should act. I'm not disagreeing, I just don't think your blog is the place where the discussion on behalf of the bloggers should be taking place.
Jeremy said…
Flat out wrong. No explanation, just flat out wrong. Neat-o!

Popular posts from this blog

Charlottesville, Skinheads, White Supremacists, Trump and Idiocy

I'm having a lot of emotions about what took place in Charlottesville, Virginia this weekend. None of them are good or positive for the direction of the United States. The GOP rode a media whore, a second rate TV "star", and lifelong con artist to the White House to help advance their agenda -- of which they have no idea how to implement.

The biggest problem is, Trump is a well documented racist that tries to help legitimize FOX News and Alex Jones and every racist thing in between. What these media properties all know is that a) division works and b) some people of faith will believe anything. Trump pushed the Obama birther theory, he declined housing to African Americans and he employs employed a racist in former Breitbart employee Steve Bannon. I'm not going to get into his circus of racists on staff including Gorka and Miller, because they aren't worth the words.
I have a lot of conservative friends that voted DRUMPF with hopes he'd bust up Washington. An…

Everything That's Wrong With Social Media in One GIF

I submit to the jury:

How to Rick Roll Someone

I've noticed a lot of traffic to my blog from a post I did on Rick Roll. In particular, people are looking for how to do it. So, without further adieu, here's a quick 1, 2, 3 on "How to Rick Roll Someone."


Pick your target. This should be someone not suspecting a peculiar link, email or heads up. Works great if you're the guy/girl in the office known for sending YouTube links via IM
Grab the URL. The YouTube video is probably the easiest to snag, because the URL isn't a dead giveaway. Sites that truncate URLs like SnipURL and TinyURL are handy if you want to send folks to yougotrickrolled.com.
Pick your delivery method and send! IM, email, blog (wink!), what-have-you.


Please, feel free to get creative. Our programmers used a "Can someone test this site?" email to the office to Rick Roll the entire staff. Or better yet - send the URL along to unsuspecting family members as "Our newest family pictures!".

Another fun way is via conference or phon…