Skip to main content

If Twitter went away, would anyone care?

Disclaimer: This is no way an attempt to rip off of the great series John Moore runs over on BrandAutopsy -- the title just seemed fitting.

I have been using Twitter for some time now, increasing my usage to see if it changes how I'm consuming media and, more importantly, my opinion of it. I'm nearing my 500th update, and my opinion has yet to change. It's still full of essentially useless information with the occasional nugget of good information thrown in.

Case in point are a few gems over the past 24 hours from people I'm following that include JasonCalacanis's tweet that he's "Walking the dogs at 1 am..." and chrisabraham's "Stumbled to the kitchen and made bread and butter and cheese" update.

Twitter was scheduled to go down for maintenance yesterday for 12 hours, with Twitter addicts, aka Twitheads, freaking out that they wouldn't be able to update their virtual friends with useless info. For those unfamiliar with Twitter, think of it this way -- remember when cell phones first came out, and people would call each other just because they could? Yeah, it's kinda like that. Loren has a funny vid about it here. I couldn't have said it better myself.

So with the astute point that life will go on and that people will still stay in touch via email, Facebook, phone, Skype -- hell, you name it -- I've tried to find reasons as to why Twitter will succeed... because yesterday's reaction to scheduled maintenance (which, consequently, was moved to tonight at 10 PM PST) was the closest thing I've seen to a web-app version of Y2K. Is it really the type of 2.0 app that, if it went away, would cause riots? Um, no.

Aside from the fact that there are a ton of other apps and technologies out there with wider adoption, having self-serving marketers publish bad research titles don't help the cause -- just because I have Twitter on my Facebook page doesn't mean people read it, let alone know what the hell it is, let alone "use" it, as Forrester claims. If I use my iPhone, it means I am physically touching, listening or doing something with it. Forrester's research says that it counts as "use" if someone on the subway sees it. I completely respect their work and studies, but that footnote make the research nearly worthless. The reality is that 1% of regular web users have interacted with Twitter -- so while the marketing/PR and tech folks of the world, essentially, are on board, the general public isn't. "Why not?", you may be asking. Here are a few reasons:

  1. It's not SMS/texting.. Kids can text and talk to each other through their cell phones, and that's where all of their friends are now, including address books, installed IM apps, etc.

  2. It doesn't provide a better solution. The daily "Bring that noise back!" messages, e.g. our service is down, are way too frequent to be providing what I'd consider to be a good product.

  3. No incentive. The only way I can see people jumping on en masse is if a major brand decided to provide a large enough benefit to try it. The "it's cool!" factor doesn't hold water.

  4. No upgrades. The site has been basically the same since it launched. There are some third party apps, like Snitter, that are more useful than the site itself (minus lapses/delays in updates), but the functionality of the site - from searching your tweets via the web to creating different permissions for groups of friends to basic functions like importing your address books from your cell- has basically remained the same. Meanwhile, Google buys Jaiku and will undoubtedly integrate it into their list of tools and bury Twitter because they have mass, not just hype from < 1% of the hyper-active web users.

People will ask "What's in it for me?" when being asked to use a new product or service. This value proposition is where Twitter has no real answer. Given the aforementioned reasons, the best Twitter can hope for is to be acquired by MS, Yahoo, IAC or another web giant and become integrated in their properties in a way that makes sense and is usable -- and answers the question. As mentioned, Google is clearly out of the equation with their acquisition of Jaiku and, if there is an opportunity for microblogging to succeed, will happen as a result of their actions and answer - not hype from the 1% or bad research.


whatsnext said…
this makes me wonder what you want from twitter? it's a way to talk to people. nobody is scintillating in every thought they utter.

for me, twitter is a way to stay in touch with friends, meet new people, and learn from some great minds. and if they want to tell me what they had for dinner, that's fine with me.

when all of someone's tweets are inane, i stop following them.
David Binkowski said…
thanks for the comment. but what i want to know is that if it went away, would you really care or just migrate to another app/site?
John said…
David ... you are by no means ripping this off from me. After all, I copped this "would you miss" idea from the MAVERICKS AT WORK book.

I'm a very casual Twitter-doer but some of the tweets I read said people would be migrating to a different app while Twitter was down. Seems like people are more attached to connecting online with people than they are attached to Twitter.

Thanks for the linkage David.
David Binkowski said…
thanks for the comment and history behind "would you care?". it's a great concept.

i had the fortune of presenting with Peter Hart and he had a great slide about "The New Free Agents" - basically the combination of the internet, customer service and comparison shopping has made the everyday person less loyal to brands.

this was followed by an open question to the company we were presenting at: "Given this, what are you doing to drive loyalty?"

i would pose that same question to Biz and the Twitter posse.
EricaOGrady said…
Hey David,

Funny thing - if I hadn't seen a link to your post from one of my Twitter contacts - I probably never would have read this post...

Just food for thought ;)

David Binkowski said…
good point, and thanks for the comment, however it could have easily as come via email, Facebook, Pownce or any other web property/technology you're a part of.
COD said…
I too am only here because of your tweet. However, since I average maybe 5-10 tweets a week, I'm pretty sure I would not miss it if it went away. I killed my Facebook profile last month and have not missed it for one second.

Popular posts from this blog

How to Rick Roll Someone

I've noticed a lot of traffic to my blog from a post I did on Rick Roll. In particular, people are looking for how to do it. So, without further adieu, here's a quick 1, 2, 3 on "How to Rick Roll Someone."

Pick your target. This should be someone not suspecting a peculiar link, email or heads up. Works great if you're the guy/girl in the office known for sending YouTube links via IM
Grab the URL. The YouTube video is probably the easiest to snag, because the URL isn't a dead giveaway. Sites that truncate URLs like SnipURL and TinyURL are handy if you want to send folks to
Pick your delivery method and send! IM, email, blog (wink!), what-have-you.

Please, feel free to get creative. Our programmers used a "Can someone test this site?" email to the office to Rick Roll the entire staff. Or better yet - send the URL along to unsuspecting family members as "Our newest family pictures!".

Another fun way is via conference or phon…

My first Facebook spam!

Well, that didn't take long. I was spammed twice today via my Facebook profile by someone named Andrea Rowe, saying that she likes my profile picture (flattery is my weak spot) and wanted to chat. She's promoting a site through one of the TinyURL-esque sites and let me know that her username is "foxy_hotty". Here's her follow up message:

hi there David, how's it going? i wanted to chat with you, but they don't have that here, whatever. if you'd like to, you can check out my other profile at my username's foxy_hotty. we can chat there, just dont mind the bad pics, lol. soooo, ya, see you i hope.

Yes, I edited the SnipURL ending because I refuse to give spammers free promotion or even worse, the click through. For those unaware, sites like SnipURL and TinyURL allow you to send truncated versions of URLs, which is particularly handy when you're posting URLs to your blog (formatting) or SMS-based tools like Jaiku and Twitte…

Fake Facebook Likes and Twitter Followers -- And the Implications for Brands

This post originally appeared on the Large Media blog.

There's been a lot of talk about Twitter followers lately, including both presidential candidates, celebrities, musicians and the like utilizing services to game their numbers. Specifically, a lot of the "Top 10" have been found to have a substantial amount of fake followers, in some case to the point where 70% of their following is either bots or inactive profiles. Most articles and infographics on the subject are telling, however with a little digging you can find out that there are also social media "experts" utilizing the service to give the appearance of bloated numbers. Intrigued, and given our rare propensity to tweet as an agency, we wanted to see what the fuss was about.

So we gave it a try.


In August we saw some ads on a third party Twitter "profile checker" site  saying they can send a thousand followers your way for $9. The process is pretty simple: select how many followers yo…