Skip to main content

Improving the Social Media RFP

The idea for this post came from Josh Hallett's "Sorry We Work In Different Industries" blog post and was cross posted over on

Yesterday an agency posted their RFP criteria for companies looking to hire a social media firm. It's self serving as all get up, but not a bad start. I'm sure the agency will undoubtedly not let anyone forget that they were the first to post it on their blog, which as we know means a LOT. </sarcasm>

There is one question missing from the RFP, however.

How often does your senior leadership speak at conferences?

I'm not asking this because I think speaking is or isn't crucial to provide expertise. I have been known to hit the road and/or give presentations too. There's nothing wrong with spreading knowledge and engaging in discussion with your peers and industry-types. The difference, as Josh rightfully points out, is that when you're on the road constantly there's no way you can be servicing your client. In a business that's based on expertise and relationships (and execution, really), one can't possibly sustain both when they're pouring their heart and soul into just one.

So if you see me at a conference or I happen to rush out of the room after speaking, just remember that it's not out of disrespect -- I have client work to do.


Dave Kerpen said…
I think this is a great point, David - and brings up a bigger question: How much execution work has an agency done and does an agency do? I see lots of "social media agencies" who are very focused on strategy, consulting, or training, (or speaking!) and less experienced or focused on execution.

It seems to me that while some agencies (or consultancies) are on the speaking circuit, others, as you've suggested, are more focused on actually doing execution for their clients.
I like that you think. Thank you for share very much.
enozth said…
I like your website. Thank you for great information. I will come back to your website again.

Popular posts from this blog

How to Rick Roll Someone

I've noticed a lot of traffic to my blog from a post I did on Rick Roll. In particular, people are looking for how to do it. So, without further adieu, here's a quick 1, 2, 3 on "How to Rick Roll Someone."

Pick your target. This should be someone not suspecting a peculiar link, email or heads up. Works great if you're the guy/girl in the office known for sending YouTube links via IM
Grab the URL. The YouTube video is probably the easiest to snag, because the URL isn't a dead giveaway. Sites that truncate URLs like SnipURL and TinyURL are handy if you want to send folks to
Pick your delivery method and send! IM, email, blog (wink!), what-have-you.

Please, feel free to get creative. Our programmers used a "Can someone test this site?" email to the office to Rick Roll the entire staff. Or better yet - send the URL along to unsuspecting family members as "Our newest family pictures!".

Another fun way is via conference or phon…

My first Facebook spam!

Well, that didn't take long. I was spammed twice today via my Facebook profile by someone named Andrea Rowe, saying that she likes my profile picture (flattery is my weak spot) and wanted to chat. She's promoting a site through one of the TinyURL-esque sites and let me know that her username is "foxy_hotty". Here's her follow up message:

hi there David, how's it going? i wanted to chat with you, but they don't have that here, whatever. if you'd like to, you can check out my other profile at my username's foxy_hotty. we can chat there, just dont mind the bad pics, lol. soooo, ya, see you i hope.

Yes, I edited the SnipURL ending because I refuse to give spammers free promotion or even worse, the click through. For those unaware, sites like SnipURL and TinyURL allow you to send truncated versions of URLs, which is particularly handy when you're posting URLs to your blog (formatting) or SMS-based tools like Jaiku and Twitte…

Fake Facebook Likes and Twitter Followers -- And the Implications for Brands

This post originally appeared on the Large Media blog.

There's been a lot of talk about Twitter followers lately, including both presidential candidates, celebrities, musicians and the like utilizing services to game their numbers. Specifically, a lot of the "Top 10" have been found to have a substantial amount of fake followers, in some case to the point where 70% of their following is either bots or inactive profiles. Most articles and infographics on the subject are telling, however with a little digging you can find out that there are also social media "experts" utilizing the service to give the appearance of bloated numbers. Intrigued, and given our rare propensity to tweet as an agency, we wanted to see what the fuss was about.

So we gave it a try.


In August we saw some ads on a third party Twitter "profile checker" site  saying they can send a thousand followers your way for $9. The process is pretty simple: select how many followers yo…